Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G645T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1824 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €25.66 vs €379.64
- Up to 93% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.13 vs €1.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 5% better in The Outer Worlds than Pentium G645T - 202 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 16 vs 2 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
193
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18017 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.88/FPS
6%
Price, €
€379.64
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18018 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G645T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |