Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1002 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 4% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G1610 - 212 vs 203 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
203
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4400 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |