Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2430 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €39.9 vs €208.88
- Up to 75% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i5-11600K - €0.18 vs €0.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 53 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 26% better in Lost Ark than Pentium G3250 - 285 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 12 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
227
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19553 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
285
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
24%
Price, €
€208.88
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19554 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |