Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-4690 - 265 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €43.99 vs €208.88
- Up to 76% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-11600K - €0.19 vs €0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 84 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
265
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
24%
Price, €
€208.88
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7229 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
231
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7230 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |