Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3570 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3210 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 9% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-3570 - 164 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €33.99 vs €208.88
- Up to 82% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-11600K - €0.23 vs €1.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.27/FPS
18%
Price, €
€208.88
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13420 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
151
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €33.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13419 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i5-3570 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |