Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-13100F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-11600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-13100F is 659 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-11600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-11600K - 457 vs 453 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €104.02 vs €208.88
- Up to 50% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-11600K - €0.23 vs €0.46 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 267 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
457
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€104.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €104.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 266 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |