Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3319 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 43% better in Rust than Core i7-3820 - 231 vs 161 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €62.78 vs €182.66
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €182.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75487 minutes ago
Buy for €62.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75486 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Single-Core
617
28.22506861848124%
Multi-Core
2299
26.797995104324514%
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |