Buy on Amazon
€39.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3250 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Pentium G3250 is 636 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6300 - 170 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 2% cheaper than Pentium G3250 - €38.99 vs €39.9
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 6 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Intel LGA1150 Processore Pentium G3250 da 3.2GHz, 54W, Grigio
Buy for €39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18240 minutes ago
CPU AMD FX-6300, Socket AM3+, 4 core, 6MB di cache, 3.3GHz, 32nm, 95W TDP
Buy for €38.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18240 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Pentium | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
