Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3250 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3250 is 595 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 0% better in Dishonored 2 than Celeron G1610 - 256 vs 255 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
255
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |