Buy on Amazon
€39.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2430 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - €39.9 vs €69.02
- Up to 33% better value when playing Valorant than Core i3-10105F - €0.06 vs €0.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 13% better in Valorant than Pentium G3250 - 781 vs 694 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 8 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
694
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel LGA1150 Processore Pentium G3250 da 3.2GHz, 54W, Grigio
Buy for €39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
781
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
66%
Price, €
€69.02
57%
FPS Winner
Intel, processore desktop Core i3-10105F 10, di 10ᵃ generazione (frequenza di base: 3,7 GHz, turbo boost: 4,4 GHz, 4 core, LGA1200) BX8070110105
Buy for €69.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
