Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Pentium B940 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 533 days newer than Pentium B940.
Advantages of Intel Pentium B940
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 10% better in FIFA 23 than Pentium B940 - 92 vs 84 FPS
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
92
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium B940 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |