Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Pentium 3825U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1887 days newer than Pentium 3825U.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 3825U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 18% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Pentium 3825U - 134 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 3825U - 8 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 3825U | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-U | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |