Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Pentium 3805U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 674 days newer than Pentium 3805U.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 3805U
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 15 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium 3805U - 117 vs 113 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
117
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 567 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 3805U | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell-U | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |