Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Pentium 3556U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 272 days older than Pentium 3556U.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 3556U
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 15 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Pentium 3556U - 167 vs 165 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 3556U | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |