Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 1225 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Celeron G3900 - 154 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - €60.9 vs €455.01
- Up to 86% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-9900KF - €0.42 vs €2.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.95/FPS
14%
Price, €
€455.01
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €455.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
145
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |