Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €60.9 vs €456.1
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 31% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G3900 - 191 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 299 minutes ago
Buy for €456.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 299 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
19.542549613185333%
Multi-Core
992
4.935077856823043%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |