Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-13700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-13700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 99 days older than the cheaper Core i7-13700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-13700F - 168 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700F - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €383.0 vs €540.99
- Up to 29% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-13900KF - €2.29 vs €3.22 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.22/FPS
71%
Price, €
€540.99
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for €540.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
167
99%
Value, €/FPS
€2.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€383
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €383 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |