Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-13700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-13700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F and the cheaper Core i7-13700F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €382.9 vs €584.48
- Up to 34% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-13900F - €2.03 vs €3.08 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-13700F - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700F - 32 vs 24 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
189
99%
Value, €/FPS
€2.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€382.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €382.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
190
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.08/FPS
65%
Price, €
€584.48
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for €584.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |