Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 2682 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - €60.9 vs €382.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Core i7-13700F - €0.39 vs €1.85 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 31% better in Resident Evil 4 than Celeron G3900 - 207 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
158
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Buy for €382 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |