Buy on Amazon
€60.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $399
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 1771 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800XT - €60.9 vs €424.03
- Up to 83% better value when playing Lost Ark than Ryzen 7 3800XT - €0.27 vs €1.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 19% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G3900 - 270 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
227
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
270
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.57/FPS
17%
Price, €
€424.03
14%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT Processore senza dispositivo di raffreddamento, 8 Core 3.9 GHz Socket AM4 Boxato
Buy for €424.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
