Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1622 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 181% better in League of Legends than Ryzen 5 2600 - 394 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €84.44 vs €525.97
- Up to 55% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i9-13900KF - €0.6 vs €1.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
394
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.33/FPS
45%
Price, €
€525.97
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €525.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 225 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
140
35%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €84.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 226 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |