Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 18% better in World of Warcraft than Core i5-11400F - 235 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €114.44 vs €524.87
- Up to 74% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i9-13900KF - €0.57 vs €2.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
235
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.23/FPS
25%
Price, €
€524.87
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €524.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
200
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€114.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €114.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |