Buy on Amazon
€400.3
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 17% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G1610 - 183 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €72.66 vs €400.3
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i9-10900KF
Buy for €400.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 467 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
24.163357912648895%
Multi-Core
739
8.072973563469521%
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i9-10900KF or Celeron G1610
No Man's Sky, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
63 FPS
€22.68/FPS
Radeon RX 580
Core i9-10900KF
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€1,429
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
