Buy on Amazon
€331.59
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 247% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Celeron G1610 - 132 vs 38 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €72.66 vs €331.59
- Up to 24% better value when playing Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Core i9-10900KF - €1.91 vs €2.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i9-10900KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.51/FPS
76%
Price, €
€331.59
21%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-10900KF, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 10 core fino a 5,3 GHz sbloccato senza grafica del processore LGA1200 (chipset Intel® serie 400) 125 W
Buy for €331.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11305 minutes ago
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
38
28%
Value, €/FPS
€1.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.66
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11304 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i9-10900KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
