Buy on Amazon
€288.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Pentium Gold G6405 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium Gold G6405 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 320 days older than the cheaper Pentium Gold G6405.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Pentium Gold G6405 - 280 vs 263 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €81.5 vs €288.88
- Up to 70% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-10900F - €0.31 vs €1.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 58 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
280
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
30%
Price, €
€288.88
28%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-10900F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 10 core fino a 5,2 GHz sbloccato senza grafica del processore LGA1200 (chipset Intel® serie 400) 65 W
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Pentium Gold G6405
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
263
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.5
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium Gold G6405 processor 4.1 GHz 4 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for €81.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 314 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Pentium Gold G6405
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
