Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-10105F - 236 vs 234 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €73.0 vs €272.66
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €272.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75697 minutes ago
Buy for €73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75696 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1454
86.75417661097852%
Multi-Core
4472
53.07381913126038%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |