Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1115 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 5 1600X - 221 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €231.03 vs €287.54
- Up to 12% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-10900F - €1.15 vs €1.3 per FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
221
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.3/FPS
88%
Price, €
€287.54
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for €287.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
201
90%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€231.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €231.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |