Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 23% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G1840 - 112 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €72.66 vs €272.66
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €272.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75667 minutes ago
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75666 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
30.13126491646778%
Multi-Core
854
10.135295513885593%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |