Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 2227 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Celeron G1610 - 203 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-9700KF - €72.66 vs €332.66
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €332.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76352 minutes ago
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76351 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
25.570228091236498%
Multi-Core
739
10.39819895877304%
Intel Core i7-9700KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |