Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 448 days newer than Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 12% better in Cities: Skylines II than Core i7-9700F - 37 vs 33 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 64 vs 8 threads
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
33
89.1891891891892%
Value, €/FPS
€12.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€422.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €422.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2448 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1549
93.595166163142%
Multi-Core
6256
42.91103642225118%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |