Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Core i7-9700 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 448 days newer than Core i7-9700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 4% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-9700 - 399 vs 385 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700 - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €322.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 297 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1556
94.01812688821752%
Multi-Core
6217
42.64352836271349%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 8 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |