Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Ryzen 5 1600X - 185 vs 182 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €74.44 vs €422.66
- Up to 82% better value when playing Stray than Core i7-9700F - €0.41 vs €2.28 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 12 vs 8 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
185
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.28/FPS
17.982456140350877%
Price, €
€422.66
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €422.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
182
98.37837837837839%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1123
72.49838605551969%
Multi-Core
4766
76.18286445012788%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |