Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9600K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9600K is 186 days older than the more expensive Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-9700F - 136 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €209.12 vs €268.88
- Up to 23% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-9700F - €1.54 vs €2.01 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €268.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€209.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €209.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |