Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 2463 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - €74.44 vs €291.48
- Up to 71% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-14400F - €0.41 vs €1.4 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 1600X - 208 vs 181 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
181
87.01923076923077%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.4/FPS
29.28571428571429%
Price, €
€291.48
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €291.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1123
47.78723404255319%
Multi-Core
4766
41.957918830883%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |