Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 1115 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - €231.18 vs €268.88
- Up to 11% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i7-10700KF - €0.97 vs €1.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 5 1600X - 246 vs 238 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 16 vs 12 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
238
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
100%
Price, €
€231.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €231.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13902 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
246
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.09/FPS
88%
Price, €
€268.88
85%
FPS Winner
Buy for €268.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13902 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |