Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 356 days older than the cheaper Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 2% better in War Thunder than Core i3-8100T - 164 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Up to 14% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600X - €199.59 vs €231.18
- Up to 12% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen 5 1600X - €1.24 vs €1.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.41/FPS
87%
Price, €
€231.18
86%
FPS Winner
Buy for €231.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15880 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
161
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €199.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15880 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |