Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 759 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-8100T - 193 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - €199.59 vs €268.88
- Up to 20% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700KF - €1.11 vs €1.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.39/FPS
79%
Price, €
€268.88
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for €268.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18633 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
180
93%
Value, €/FPS
€1.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €199.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18634 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |