Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 759 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €182.45 vs €272.66
- Up to 27% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-10900F - €1.1 vs €1.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-8100T - 181 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 20 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
166
91%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11017 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.51/FPS
72%
Price, €
€272.66
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for €272.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11016 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |