Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 1946 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 12% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G1610 - 130 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
116
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700T | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |