Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i7-840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2629 days newer than Core i7-840QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-840QM
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 45 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-840QM - 127 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-840QM - 16 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
127
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11428 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-840QM | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Clarksfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |