Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4930K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4930K is 730 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Performs up to 4% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G3900 - 186 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i7-4930K - €60.9 vs €182.45
- Up to 65% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-4930K - €0.34 vs €0.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
179
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4930K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |