Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-4770 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-4770 is 1551 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770
- Performs up to 1% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 334 vs 332 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €288.88 vs €379.64
- Up to 25% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.86 vs €1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770 - 16 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
334
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€288.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18525 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
332
99%
Value, €/FPS
€1.14/FPS
75%
Price, €
€379.64
76%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18525 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4770 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |