Buy on Amazon
€379.64
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i7-4702HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1557 days newer than Core i7-4702HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4702HQ
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 37 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-4702HQ - 254 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4702HQ - 16 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
254
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen ™ Threadripper 1900X, S TR4, 8 core, 16 fili, 3,8 GHz, 4,0 GHz Turbo, 20 MB, 64 linee, 180 W, CPU, vendita al dettaglio
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i7-4702HQ
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4702HQ | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
