Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3319 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - €49.99 vs €258.88
- Up to 78% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-11900F - €0.26 vs €1.19 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-3820 - 217 vs 193 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
193
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12237 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
217
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.19/FPS
21%
Price, €
€258.88
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12237 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |