Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3879 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - €49.99 vs €301.02
- Up to 79% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-13600K - €0.42 vs €1.99 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 27% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-3820 - 151 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
119
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13559 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
151
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.99/FPS
21%
Price, €
€301.02
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €301.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13560 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |