Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 150% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G3900 - 258 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - €60.9 vs €299.98
- Up to 49% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i5-13600K - €0.59 vs €1.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 51 vs 125 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
258
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.16/FPS
50%
Price, €
€299.98
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €299.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
103
39%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |