Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2999 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €49.99 vs €340.43
- Up to 81% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-10900F - €0.34 vs €1.75 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 33% better in Dirt 5 than Core i7-3820 - 194 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 20 vs 8 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
146
75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.75/FPS
19%
Price, €
€340.43
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €340.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |