Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3552 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - €49.99 vs €428.99
- Up to 84% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-12900K - €0.43 vs €2.77 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 32% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3820 - 155 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
117
75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14331 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
155
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.77/FPS
15%
Price, €
€428.99
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €428.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14331 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |