Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2630QM outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-2630QM is 2192 days older than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2630QM
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 45 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2630QM | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |