Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 99 days older than the cheaper Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 9% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-13400F - 134 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - €211.0 vs €396.99
- Up to 42% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-13700K - €1.72 vs €2.96 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.96/FPS
58%
Price, €
€396.99
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €396.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16217 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
123
91%
Value, €/FPS
€1.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€211
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €211 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16217 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700K | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |