Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 99 days older than the cheaper Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - €211.0 vs €301.01
- Up to 26% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-13600K - €0.31 vs €0.42 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 8% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-13400F - 723 vs 672 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
672
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€211
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €211 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
723
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
73%
Price, €
€301.01
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for €301.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 14 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |